Carleton University School of Architecture

 

ARCC 4500: Fall 2005   Design Economics

 

Instructor:               Vincent Colizza

Lectures:                Wednesdays, 8:30am – 11:30am

TA’s:                      Ryan Koolwine

                              Tim Rosenberg

 

E-mail:    design_ec@yahoo.ca

 

Design Economics Main Class Web Site: http://www.dramatispersonae.org/DesignEconomicsFrontPage.htm

 

City Planning and Organization (Enterprise of the City) Main Class Web Site: http://www.dramatispersonae.org/EnterpriseOfTheCity/HomePage/EnterpriseOfTheCityFrontPage.htm

 

Entrepreneurialist Culture Main Class Web Site: http://www.dramatispersonae.org/EnterpriseOfTheCity/HomePage/EnterpriseOfTheCityFrontPage.htm

 

Dr. Bruce M. Firestone Personal Web Site: http://www.dramatispersonae.org/

 

Introduction:

 

There is an unspoken crisis in the architectural profession. Architects are expected to lead project teams in an increasingly complex development process sometimes without first having studied and mastered the underlying municipal processes and second, under a fee structure that is increasingly unrealistic. Margins in the profession are being squeezed at the same time as the expectations and needs of clients, municipal planners and politicians, approval agencies and community activists are soaring. Young professional architects feel that they are exploited by the system and that it is financially unrewarding to establish their own practice. The Design Economics course is aimed at giving students the skills they need to survive and thrive in a tough, competitive world; to obtain fair value for themselves and for their profession and to meet the needs of their clients and patrons.

 

 

Course Description and Objectives:

 

In this course, we will examine the needs of today's architectural practice, the challenges that the profession faces and look at some solutions for the financial challenges faced in architectural practice. We will look at the ethics of becoming an architect and developer at the same time potentially coming into competition with one's own clients; ownership of intellectual property; product extensions into non-traditional areas including, for example, the architect's evolving role in construction and design in cyberspace, data mining, data graphics and architectural signage. We will ask whether there are other extensions of the architect's skill set that can further enhance the profession.

We will see if there are ways and means for architects to increase their value to clients (and, hence, their fees) by understanding better the creation of value through design and the design program. We will try to understand the link between quality design and creativity, on the one hand, and the overall return of a project for a client. We will try to refocus the professional architect away from an exclusive reliance on cost reduction and cost control to reach a better balance between economic inputs and economic outputs. Students will learn to justify their designs using cost/benefit analysis; they will be able to demonstrate to their clients that higher design costs may be more than offset by greater benefits.

 

Course Requirements & Due Dates:

ARCC4500

 

Course Participation and Attendance:

5%

 

“2 Questions” Assignment:   

5%

Due in class October 5th

Personal Website:

15%

Initial upload due October 19th

Essay:    

10%

Due in class October 26th

Granny Flat Assignment:

30%

Due December 7th

Final Exam:

35%

T.B.A.

 

               *NOTE – YOU MUST PASS THE FINAL EXAM IN ORDER TO PASS THIS COURSE

 

               Essay

 

Students will be required to write one 1500 – 2000 word (approx 5 page) essay on a choice of topics or an approved student selected topic.  Please ensure that essays are written in a manner proper to a fourth year course, including proper citation.  Essays will be reviewed for plagiarism. 

 

The list of essay topics can be found at:   

http://www.dramatispersonae.org/DesignEconomics/Essay_topics.htm

 

 

               Granny Flat Assignment:     

 

This is the major assignment component of the course and is assigned in teams of two. The project will involve a design element, a functional program, a critical path analysis, cost estimating and a financial analysis. The design element will require that the student use Form Z, AutoCAD or some other CAD program. Your design and analysis will be posted to your student Personal Web Site for review. The project will involve written and presentation material. We will examine the construction of a granny flat; its design and its costs and benefits. Students will learn to use a spreadsheet program (Microsoft Excel) to prepare a budget, a design program and calculate the costs and benefits (including the Internal Rate of Return, IRR). Students will be expected to use the CMHC library (referring to R. S. Means or other current cost coefficient handbooks) or other suitable sources to do a detailed quantity survey of the project.

 

 

               Personal Website

 

Each student will be required to master rudimentary web development skills and post their assignments to their personal website.  Students may use web hosting services made available by Carleton University or may reserve their own professional and personal domain name. Students will post their resumé, 'Bull Durham' bio, Granny flat assignment, and essay on their sites. They will provide the TA with their URLs as well as hard copies for selected assignments.  It is encouraged that students also take advantage of the exposure afforded by the web, and post portfolio material to their websites.

 

Carleton University Web Hosting Services can be found at:

http://apps.carleton.ca/ccs/web/hosting/student.asp

 

 

Grading:

 

For the grade in the "A" range, the instructor will have judged the student to have satisfied the stated objectives of the course in an outstanding to excellent manner; for the "B" range, in an above average manner; for the "C" range, in an average manner with C- being the lowest acceptable grade in the Program's Core courses; for the "D" range, in the lowest acceptable manner in non-Core courses, and for "F", not to have satisfied the stated objectives of the course. Grades will be assigned as A+ (90-100%), A (85-89%), A- (80-84%), B+ (77-79%), B (73-76%), B- (70-72%), C+ (67-69%), C (63-66%), C- (60-62%), D+ (57-59%), D (53-56%), D- (50-52%), F (0-49%) and ABS. (Please refer to the Calendar for regulations concerning grades, appeals and other program requirement information.)