Design Economics Handbook—For Architects, Artists and Engineers

Getting Rich While You’re Still Alive

 

DRAFT OUTLINE

 

Foreword

 

Friedrich Nietzsche is reputed to have said about his books that they were: ‘Stillborn from the press.’ I am sure he was frustrated that in his entire lifetime, he is reported to have never sold more than 200 copies of his works. Now if Nietzsche had read the Design Economics Handbook, maybe he wouldn’t have uttered this comment because he would have learned to capture more of the value he created while he was still alive.

 

Artists and institutions involved with their education are increasingly aware of the need to train not only in the creative arts but also as entrepreneurs. Who wants to end up like most artists do where ‘death is a career move’? A novelist, a painter, a dancer, an actor, a poet, a musician, a composer, a conductor, all of them are actually entrepreneurs—persons for whom a basic understanding of economics, business and entrepreneurship might come in handy.

 

Major Colleges and Universities specializing in teaching Artists, Architects, Engineers and others who make their living from their creativity are coming to recognize this and are re-orienting their courses to engender a better understanding of economics, entrepreneurship and the value of creativity.

 

As an engineer, who nearly flunked Engineering Economics and then spent most of his career in business and academia (teaching entrepreneurship amongst other things), I can certainly appreciate the degree of difficulty creative people have in mastering this subject. It took me quite a while to understand: that a price for a good or service is (largely) unrelated to the cost of producing it, that a price for something is (usually) set by agreement between a buyer and a seller, that a dollar today is worth more than a dollar next year and not just because of inflationary expectations or opportunity costs. But they gave me my Ph.D. anyway.

 

My goal here is to give Architects, Artists and Engineers the analytical techniques and an understanding of the economic paradigm they are working in so that they can shift the balance of power a bit more in their favor; for example, to make the discussion between a client and an Architect about their fees a more informed one, on both sides.

 

Let’s see if there are ways and means for Architects or Engineers to increase their value to clients (and, hence, their fees) by better understanding the creation of value through design and the design program. Let’s try to understand the link between quality design and creativity, on the one hand, and the overall return of a project for a client.

 

In fact, we can demonstrate that much of the value for many of the ‘things’ created by architects, artists and engineers derive from their creativity and not necessarily from tangible assets. (See my essay on the value for Treescapes, for example). Why is it that when you multiply the stock price of a creative company like Disney times the number of outstanding shares, one gets a value for the company that is much greater than the sum total of its hard assets? The difference probably is made up of the value of the company’s brand and its IP (intellectual property).

 

There is an unspoken crisis in the creative professions. Architects are expected to lead project teams in an increasingly complex development process without first having studied and mastered the underlying municipal processes and, second, under a fee structure that is increasingly unrealistic. Margins in the profession are being squeezed at the same time as the expectations and needs of clients, municipal planners and politicians, approval agencies and community activists are soaring. Young professional architects feel that they are exploited by the system and that it is financially unrewarding to establish their own practice.

 

Maybe we can refocus clients away from an over-reliance on cost reduction and cost control; perhaps we can convince them to look at the additional benefits that can be created from additional spending. I know that Architect Supreme Douglas Cardinal managed to convince former Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau that additional spending on his superb Canadian Museum of Civilization would be more than justified by higher attendance (and higher entry fees too, for the accountants among us). Maybe we can reach a better balance between economic inputs and economic outputs. We could learn to justify our designs using cost/benefit analysis so that we can demonstrate to clients that higher design costs can be more than offset by greater benefits.

 

I generally find that if we can communicate the benefits of what we do more clearly and succinctly, it usually results in higher commissions, faster promotions, more interesting work…

 

It may be interesting for you to know that most entrepreneurs become entrepreneurs not for the usual reasons (i.e., make-more-money, set-my-own-schedule, be-my-own-boss, retire-early) but because they believe that they can create more interesting work for themselves than others can create for them. Creativity is a very powerful drive in Homo Sapiens Sapiens. People generally want to feel that they are part of something special—something bigger than themselves. Creating something new can give it to them.

 

So at least one of our objectives here is to give the student some techniques that allow them to take more control over their workflow either as entrepreneur practitioners or as intrapreneurs (essentially entrepreneurs working within larger organizations, e.g., someone else’s practice) and, hence, have more interesting, more creative (and rewarding) work.

 

Coincidentally, these are the same techniques you need if you decide to become your own client—i.e., become an architect/developer, say, or an engineer/entrepreneur. Artists are almost always on their own anyway—they are true entrepreneurs—they don’t usually get much help form outside sources of financing; there’s no VC (Venture Capital) money for artists, I am afraid*.

 

(* An interesting experiment is underway in NYC. An expert panel has selected 250 young artists there to participate in the Artist Pension Trust. Each participant contributes 20 of his or her works, which the Trust keeps until they reach retirement age. Then, their works are sold—half the proceeds go the individual artist and half are shared in a pool with the others in the Trust. Thus, they share part of the upside with the other artists in the Trust, they diversify their risks and they still have incentive to give some of their best work to the Trust in the first place.)

 

We will also take a look at the argument that anything that we create that moves the economy in a direction that leads to a higher level of sustainability will also, almost by definition, lead to economic gains as well. A more sustainable economy is nothing more than an economy that can produce the same level of output with fewer inputs. I do not accept the argument that it is a choice between ‘more guns and less butter’ or ‘more butter and fewer guns’. We will need more creativity and innovation in this century than we have ever seen before to cope with the global issues of economic disparity and environmental degradation. 

 

As Professor John Callahan in the Faculty of Engineering and Design at Carleton put it: “Nothing is sustainable unless it is also economically sustainable.” So using the techniques we teach you in the Handbook will help you measure, in a predictable way, the relative costs and benefits of two different designs or two different projects and is one way of helping you and your clients make rational decisions. It also helps the economy reach higher levels of efficiency; it rations capital and leads to greater levels of sustainability too. 

 

Existing research materials is this field are either too simplistic, lack relevance to Architects, Artists or Engineers or fail to convey the material in a manner that will actually assist them in capturing more of the value they create. We expect that the Handbook will find a wider readership not only for persons pursuing an education in engineering, architecture or the arts but also in the general public who wish to better understand design economics and the value of creativity.

 

My friend, Doug Cardinal (http://www.djcarchitect.com/), also reminds us of our responsibility to our ‘patrons’. As Artists or Architects or Engineers, we are responsible for using the resources put at our disposal wisely. If your patron commissions a work of Art or Architecture from you, Douglas tells us that it is a serious matter, worthy of concern and that no serious Artist or Architect need look down their noses at mere commercial concerns. It is incumbent on us to deliver—on time, on budget and producing the benefits we promised our patrons, sponsors, shareholders, partners, bankers, investors, employees, clients, tenants, users, viewers, etc. etc. who entrusted us with their money, prestige, credibility, time and belief.

 

That goes for Engineers too—we don’t just want products that are safe, although we do want that obviously. We want to produce on time (although no one I know will ever allow an Engineer to be responsible for determining when a product or project is ready for the marketplace. Engineers are incessant tinkerers and perfectionists and if it were up to them alone, nothing would ever be ready for prime time.) We want to produce on budget. However, we also want to produce a flow of benefits that is hopefully greater, maybe much greater, than its costs and we want to be able to demonstrate that in some kind of reliable way—and this Handbook teaches you that.

 

I tell my students that benefits are not always measured in monetary terms, although often they are. Perhaps a new Museum measures benefits in terms of higher attendance (like the Canadian Museum of Civilization has seen) or an Art Gallery measures benefits in terms of educating the public. Then there is the matter of externalities—say, for example, what are the benefits of having more public art, like the Philadelphia Mural Art Program, MAP (http://www.muralarts.org/)?

 

By having the world’s largest outdoor mural collection (1,200+), the City of Philadelphia has: brought many graffiti artist in from the cold, given pride back to communities that were in terrible shape, reduced petty street crime and vandalism, brought people back onto the streets, increased tourism, increased the retrofitting of down-at-the-heels real estate both residential and commercial and increased jobs, economic growth and property tax revenues for the City. The cost of a mural might be $5,000 or $10,000 might the flow of benefits is much, much larger and these aren’t ‘unmeasurable’ benefits. Rigorous statistical regression analysis can tell us what these are in terms of hard, cold greenbacks. I mean every time you don’t send someone to prison; you are saving society a whole bunch of money. Every tourist that takes one of the MAP walking tours is bound to spend some money at the local coffee shop, art gallery whatever.

 

Bringing street artists (AKA, Graffiti Artists) more into the mainstream and giving them paying commissions has got to be better than having city police chasing them down back alleys.

 

Now it’s true that even though the City’s budget for jails and police might go down and the revenues from local pubs and restaurants might go up, they might not be the ones funding MAP. This is what we mean when we talk about externalities—they could be either external costs or external benefits—external to the system but not unimportant.

 

This also known as the Free Rider problem, which might also be a description we could use to describe what happens when environmental benefits or disbenefits external to our economic system are not taken into account when we create new products or services. With a greater emphasis today on producing a more sustainable built-form of the City and a more sustainable economic system, we need to do a better job of bringing a notion of environmental costs and benefits into our system of accounts.

 

Knowledge is power and one of the lessons I preach to my students is to learn these techniques so that they can disintermediate the economists and the accountants and take more control over the product of their labors. It isn’t good enough anymore to say to yourself that you can always hire someone to sell your work for you or to explain why it has value. Our Dean in the Faculty of Engineering and Design at CU, Sammy Mamoud says: “You don’t always get what you deserve in life, you get what you negotiate.How true and how sad at the same time (and especially true if you have to rely on others to speak for you. So don’t.)

 

I also encourage my students to build for themselves by themselves a Personal Web Site (PWS) for life. Again, they are disintermediating (this time, the techies) and communicating in a powerful way with the Universe of Internet Users. They should gather their personal IP there over their entire careers and, who knows, one day they might find a way to make money from their PWS while lying on a beach somewhere. I only wish the Internet was where it is today when I was their age. I have no doubt that a PWS will evolve into a form of immortality for those that know what they are doing.

 

Because the Internet is such a disruptive and powerful force, no Handbook on Design Economics could be complete today without examining its impact on the creative professions. We will learn how to construct business models and re-engineer them for the Internet Age. Business models are needed not only to help structure an Architectural or Engineering Practice but also to assist them when they decide to become Architect/Developers or Engineer/Entrepreneurs. Business models are the engines of these businesses and having one means that the harder you work, the more money you can make, which isn’t always true for architects and engineers.

 

Obviously, this is valuable to Artists too. It will help them answer questions like: do I sell direct, do I use a dealer, what role the Internet plays, do I go to trade shows and fairs, how do I find a patron and pre-sell my works …

 

Creative people need to do a better job explaining why what they do is important to the community and to the sponsors and patrons of the work we do. We need to do this so we can bring more resources into play not just to increase our share of the pie but to increase the whole pie. Many people believe that more pie for me means less pie for you. If that were true, we would still live in freezing caves, lose our teeth at 20 and die before 35. No thanks.

 

Let’s go back for a moment to a time (about 12,000 years or so) when trading activity was about to begin. Imagine* a land with three families—the families of Ugh, Nnn and Zll. In this land, the family of Ugh lived by themselves on a savanna. Ugh was an expert antelope hunter providing his family with four antelopes a month. His carving skills, however, were poor, producing only one set of flint knives per month. A mile away, the family of Nnn is hungrier. Nnn is a fine producer of flint knives, producing three sets of knives per month, but he isn’t much of a hunter, bagging only one antelope per month.

 

The families of Ugh and Nnn decide to co-locate, to form a village if you will, at first, for the protection of both. By co-locating and forming the first primitive village, they also open up the possibility of observing each other and co-operating and trading between the families.

 

The result is that after a few months, they decide that Nnn must concentrate on producing flint knives and Ugh on hunting. The GDP (Gross Domestic Product) of the two families before the co-location is five antelopes and four sets of flint knives per month. After co-location and specialization, the GDP has increased to seven antelopes and six sets of flint knives each month. This represents a phenomenal increase in the well being of the two families.

 

So much so that this first village is producing goods surplus to their needs. This sets up the possibility of trading with a third family, the family of Zll, who happen to be expert in producing textiles (i.e., sewn animal skins) resulting in a further substantial increase in value for the emerging regional economy.

 

This simple example demonstrates why the 'more pie for me' doesn't necessarily mean less for you. You will note too that this primitive economy works because information about Ugh's hunting prowess is flowing from Ugh to Nnn and information about Nnn's skill with flint knives is flowing from Nnn to Ugh. What this means is that it is the beginning of an information economy and it shows how improved communications even in the 12th Millennium BC causes economic growth through the multiplication of options and opportunities.

 

Afterall, it wasn’t until the introduction by Mark Andreeson of the Mosaic Browser (later called the Netscape Browser) in 1993 that the PC turned into a mass communications tool—at which time, productivity took off. The long promised payoff from huge investments in computers had finally arrived. Communications is the key and the killer app on the Internet turned out not to be email (spam and overuse are killing email’s utility), movies-on-demand (sheesh) or pornography but data—one standard, simple (point and click) way of viewing information using a browser changed the world.

 

Humans need each other like no other animal on the planet—we are uniquely co-dependent. Skill sharing and specialization are fundamental to the improvement in the human condition.

 

What we seem to be missing in many of our communities is the feeling of belonging to the ‘tribe’; that feeling of belonging to ‘Team Ottawa’ or ‘Team New York’. We get that feeling during times of great stress like the coming together of people after the September 11th, 2001 bombings of the World Trade Center Towers.

 

I have given a lot of thought about how to engender more of this type of fellowship in our cities and towns. I have always felt it is sad to hear so many middle aged people reminisce about their high school days as the best days of their lives. What about the next 60 years?

 

And why is it that they loved those days so much; for many of them, it was the closeness of their friendships and their participation in teams—teams to participate in scientific competitions, debating societies, putting out the school year book, playing sports, going to parties, whatever. They felt they were part of something bigger than themselves.

 

It is about more than just feeling good about yourself. It’s about improving living conditions and productivity too. Sports teams, festivals, artist colonies, the performing arts, entrepreneurs, researchers, community events, random mixing, all those people involved in creative pursuits seem to add to the feeling of belonging which leads to higher ‘team’ spirit. People working in teams can create far more than the individual working alone.

 

City-State Team Spirit = Universities + Entrepreneurs + Researchers + Artists + Festivals + Performing Arts + Sports Teams = Creativity + Productivity

 

Ideas are not limited. They are for all intents and purposes infinite, perhaps the only thing (other than numbers) that is infinite in supply. There don’t appear to be any limits to human ingenuity.

 

Richard Florida (http://www.creativeclass.org/) created the Bohemian Index to reflect the level of creative enterprise in city-states. How many artists live there? What is the tolerance for diversity? How many theaters are there? How much rehearsal space is there? What kind of public support is there for the Arts?

 

So why is all this important? Well, research has shown that highly educated, highly productive people are attracted to places with a high Bohemian Index and guess what? There is a positive correlation between having highly motivated, highly creative entrepreneurs and intrapreneurs in your community and economic, social, educational, cultural and environmental progress there too. Tolerance for diversity is, to my mind, especially important since a diverse population presumably leads to a diverse economy and an atmosphere of tolerance is likely to give rise to a peaceful society. There can be no sustainable economic value created whatsoever in societies where there is a breakdown in social order. Thus, a diverse economy (rather than a mono-cultured one) in a society where there is respect for all human and property rights is going to be a more robust economic ecology.

 

The Design Economics Handbook was written to give creative individuals more power to control their professional destiny and because, at least in my view, individuals and individual efforts count.

 

Copyright, Dr. Bruce M. Firestone, Ottawa, Canada. December 2004.

 

* Taken from a speech by me to the Mayors Breakfast Series, Ottawa, April 18, 2002 (http://www.dramatispersonae.org/MayorsBreakfastPDFPartial.pdf).

 

 

Design Economics Handbook—For Architects, Artists and Engineers

Getting Rich While You’re Still Alive

 

DRAFT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Foreword

 

Chapter 1                      Introduction to Design Economics

 

Chapter 2                      Creativity and Value—Capturing More of the Value You Create, Build and Hold

 

Chapter 3                      Business Modeling for Professionals, Creating Your Own Client or Becoming Your Own Client

 

Chapter 4                      Concept Planning, Due Diligence and Functional Programming

 

Chapter 5                      Scheduling and Critical Path Methodology

 

Chapter 6                      Introduction to Budgeting (Estimating Costs and Benefits) and Cost/Benefit Analysis using Internal Rate of Return or Cap Rates

                                               

Chapter 6                      Financing

 

Chapter 7                      Supply and Demand Theory—Pricing Your Services and Products

 

Chapter 8                      Marketing Your Practice, Your Projects or Your Work

 

Chapter 9                      Market Research—Statistics, Probability Theory and Regression Analysis

 

Chapter 10                     Negotiating and Selling

 

Chapter 11                     Contracts, Payments, Consulting, Retainers, Billings, Collections (Liens, Litigation and Other Ways of Getting Paid for Your Work), Creditor                                                            Proofing, Risk Assessment and Liability

 

Chapter 12                     Ethics, Dealing with the Media and the Value of Your Reputation and Brand—Establishing Trust and Becoming Part of the Business Ecology

 

Chapter 13                     Harnessing the Power of the Internet—Productivity Gains, Reversing Out the Work, Custom Outputs from Standard Inputs, Personal Websites for                                                           Life, Collecting Your Personal IP, Making Money ‘While You Lie on a Beach’ and Intellectual Property Law

 

Chapter 14                     Future Vision

 

ADDENDUM I            For Architects—Urban Design, Highest and Best Use, City Planning and Lobbying, Re-engineering City Processes, Land Titles, Title Insurance

 

ADDENDUM II           For Artists—Relationships with Agents, Dealers and Others

 

ADDEDNDUM III       For Engineers—Sustainable Systems

 

ADDENDUM IV          Creditor Proofing

 

Appendix A                   Suggested Essay Questions (For Architects, Artists and Engineers)

 

Appendix B                   How to Present Effectively (‘Bull Durham’ Biographies)

 

Appendix C                   Student-led Lectures (FAQ and Answers) (For Architects, Artists and Engineers)

 

Appendix D                   CPM Assignments (For Architects, Artists and Engineers)

 

Appendix F                   Design Assignments and Cost/Benefit Analyses (For Architects, Artists and Engineers)

 

Appendix G                   Sample Final Exams (For Architects, Artists and Engineers)

 

http://www.dramatispersonae.org/DesignEconomicsFrontPage.htm

 

http://www.dramatispersonae.org/

 

http://www.exploriem.org/