StupidMarketingStudies

 

January 25, 2003

 

I have never been a great believer in marketing studies ever since a marketing study we had done for the Sens showed that we could sell 100,000 season tickets in Ottawa for NHL Hockey.

 

It turns out that if you ask people whether they would buy Season Tickets before you get the team, pretty much everybody agrees that they would purchase them at (almost) any price. Actually reaching into your pocket and taking cash out is a quite different thing though.

 

 

Well, at yesterday's IM meeting for Exploriem.org members, I asked the attendees what's a good time for this kind of forum and, guess what, they all said that 11:00 am to 12:30 pm EST on Fridays was pretty good. We were worried that a lot of members can't make it during the day. Immediately after I hit the enter button, I realized it was a pretty stupid question/survey.

 

It reminds me of a CFL (Canadian Football League) marketing survey done a few years ago by the BC Lions. They were concerned about doing Saturday games during the summer when lots of folks go off to their cottages. So they asked people who attended the game what they thought and, by golly, the survey showed that the folks at Saturday games during the summer were pretty happy about it.

 

Duh.

 

Clearly, both the BC Lions and Exploriem.org need to ask people who weren't there the question. So, can the people who weren't there tell brittaherrmann@exploriem.org what the best times are for you to participate in open IM sessions lasting 90 minutes; the choices are:

 

Early AM,

Midday,

PM,

Evenings,

M-F,

S-S.

 

In WWII, the Ops Research guys looked at where returning planes had been hit by flak so they would know where to reinforce the fuselage. After a while they realized how dumb that was—they needed to be examining their downed planes (a lot harder since most of them were in the sea or in Nazi controlled territory) not the returning ones.

 

I am not saying market research isn't worthwhile; what I am saying is a lot of market research isn't worthwhile.

 

I detest marketing research that says things like, "Geez, if we can just get 1% of this market, why, we'll be a $100m a year business!" Now that's crap. Sales are built one sale at a time, one client at a time.

 

Most marketing research can not predict what your sales are going to be. You create sales in the trenches and not by looking at graphs and spreadsheets.

 

One guerrilla marketing study we did a long time ago worked pretty well for us. We were thinking of going into the mini office business in the 1980s (which we eventually did becoming the largest supplier of mini offices in eastern Ontario with 164 offices in two locations). We ran some classified ads over a period of a couple of months: "Executive offices available. West End. Starting at $500 per month all inclusive. Call 729-nnnn." There were no actual offices—just a telephone with an answering machine on it. We got a ton of calls, a bunch of pre-bookings and we launched the business as a result. These were real clients calling with real cash that they wanted to spend on our virtual (vaporware) offices. This guerrilla type of market research was cheap, focused and effective. We didn’t call it Guerrilla Marketing Research in those days but that’s what it was.

 

Bruce Firestone, Ottawa, Canada

 

http://www.dramatispersonae.org/GuerrillaMarketingAndFinance/GuerrillaMarketing.htm

 

www.dramatispersonae.org

 

www.exploriem.org