Many people have the view: "More pie for you
means less for me."
The folks fighting last year on Canada's east coast
at Burnt Church over lobster quotas clearly believe this old economy saw and,
maybe they are right.
But it is possible that they aren't.
Economic growth derives from a multiplying of
options, from specialization, from comparative advantage, from the development
of standards and, in the new economy, from network effects, disintermediation
and scalability.
Now let us go back in time to the land of Ugh, Nnn and Zll.
The families of Ugh and Nnn decide to co-locate to
form a village, at first, for the protection of both. By co-locating and
forming the first primitive village, they also open up the possibility of
observing each other and co-operating and trading between the families.
The result is that after a few months, they decide
that Nnn will concentrate on producing flint knives and Ugh will focus on
hunting. The GDP of the two families before the co-location is five antelopes
and four sets of flint knives. After co-location and specialization, the GDP
has increased to seven antelopes and six sets of flint knives each month. This
represents a phenomenal increase in the well being of the two families. So much
so that this first village is producing goods surplus to their needs. This sets
up the possibility of trading with a third family, the family of Zll, who are
expert in producing textiles (animal skins) resulting in a further substantial
increase in value for the emerging regional economy.
![]() |
|
People need people like no other animal on the
planetwe are uniquely co-dependent on each other. Skill sharing is the most
fundamental reason for the improvement in the human condition. What we seem
to be missing in many of our communities is the feeling of belonging to the
tribe; that feeling of belonging to Team Ottawa or Team New York. We
get that feeling during times of great stress like the recent September 11th,
2001 bombings of the World Trade Center Towers. I have given a lot of
thought about how to engender more of this type of fellowship in our cities
and towns. It is about more than just feeling good about yourself and your
team. Its about improving living conditions and productivity too. Sports
teams, festivals, artist colonies, the performing arts, entrepreneurs,
researchers, all those people involved in creative pursuits seem to add to
the feeling of belonging which leads to higher team spirits. People working
in teams can create far more than the individual working alone. City-State Team Spirit = Festivals + Performing
Arts + Universities + Entrepreneurs + Researchers + Artists + Sports Teams =
Creativity + Productivity For example, the tulip festival of Ottawa
celebrates its 50th anniversary in 2002. They are creating a five
foot high tulip (partly in answer to the wildly popular Toronto Moose)two of
these sculptures will be given to each of Ottawas 21 Councilors to take into
their wards to get local artists there to paint them. The Mayor will then
declare the Tulip as the official flower of the City and the 42 originals
will be auctioned off. Visitors will see these enormous tulips everywhere. It
will be a sign of hope and friendship (the Tulip Festival started because
Canada gave refuge to Queen Julianna and her children in WWII and Canadian
fighting men liberated the Netherlands from the Nazis. The gift of Tulips
from Holland represents everlasting friendship between the two nations. City
building is essentially an optimistic endeavour and the sense that we are all
in it together helps. Cities and towns all over vie to have the biggest
something-or-other: hockey stick or whatever. Some towns have big slogans like Biggar, Alberta:
New York is big, but this is Biggar. {Just a little bit better than Ottawa's $200,000 slogan: "Technically Beautiful", don't you think?} Think about how important fire is to almost all human technology. It is amazing to me that in two episodes of the television hit show Survivor Australia and Survivor Africa, 32 people, contestants who knew for months that they would be on this show, could not light a fire with stone age tools after two days of trying on each show. These people had months to prepare; they had access to books on how to do it; they obviously had read them because they put the tools together-but they got smoke but no fire. Ugh. Imagine how valuable someone who could reliably do it would be on one of those teams. (Tom Hanks did better on his own in Castaway!) |
Ideas are not limited. They are for all intents and
purposes infinite. There are no limits to human ingenuity. But you need a great
team to make these ideas actually work for you.
|
Business Team Spirit = Sense of Mission +
Leadership + Camaraderie + Opportunity + Learning + Challenge + GTBR* |
(* Get The Business Model Right so that the
harder you work, the more money you make.)
In every business, there are 'secrets' to success.
Things that the experts do that may never be verbalized or written down but are
essential for success in that industry. The Business Model should help you find
out what those 'secrets' are.
In Dell's business model, their secrets are
deceptively simple- Dell's Business Model is: a) make-to-order, b) cash arrives
(i.e., they are paid) before the product is build or delivered.
This is the 'pixie dust' that makes their business
model work so that a college drop-out (Michael Dell) can build the biggest PC
manufacturer on the planet. The differentiator is the pixie dust. We
need an algorithm that will show where the pixie dust is!
Amazon's pixie dust is their use of their relational
data base: "Do you want to see what others who bought this book are also
buying?" Obviously that is an up sell pitch for Amazon but also an
incredibly useful research tool for harried university professors who can put
the millions of Amazon customers to work for them doing research.
A Canadian University's pixie dust is its monopoly
power to confer degrees.
Dell's is as described above- making money before
ordering any inventory or production.
For most people, their 'pixie dust' is simply having
a J.O.B. that pays them every two weeks.
Walmart's pixie dust is simply automated and
integrated inventory management (integrated with POS (Point of Sale) systems)-
having suppliers send (directly) basketballs to Nashville and hockey skates to
Kanata in the right quantities and at the right times.
Cisco's pixie dust is outsource everything.
The NHL's pixie dust or the NFL's is the right to
grant local hockey or football monopolies.
The Corel Centre's (and the Sens) is outsource
everything except for key customer (i.e., season ticket holders) and sponsor
relationships and hockey management (i.e., how to put a winning product on the
ice).
There is something 'magical' in most businesses that
allows them to really make money.
If you get the Business Model right, the harder you
work, the more money you make. If you get it wrong, no matter how hard you
work, you just end up losing more and more money. And the 'pixie dust' is what
differentiates your business and gives you leverage in the marketplace.
(Help us find out more about 'Pixie Dust'-- give us
examples from your business or ones you know a lot about. Go to: www.dramatispersonae.org/PixieDust.htm
and complete our survey.)
|
Pixie Dust = Advantage x
Cash Engine x Passion where: Advantage = What is the
organization the best in the world at? Cash Engine = What is the
price/cost equation that drives the organization's cash position? Passion = What are the
organization's core people deeply passionate about? Example: if Advantage is
0, your business model has no pixie dust. You have a model, but it will not
work. Same if Passion = 0 or Economic Engine = 0. Your business model
generates lots of pixie dust when Advantage is high, Cash Engine is high and
Passion is high. Professor Tony Bailetti,
Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. October 15, 2001. |
You know you never want to get too high or too low. Life is full of up and down cycles.
I still remember an Ottawa Citizen headline a few days before we got the Ottawa Senators franchise: "And the winners are Seattle, Milwaukee." That hurts.
Actually, it was Ottawa and Tampa.
The night before we won the franchise, one of the voters (i.e., a member of the Board of Governors) told me (at a NHL dinner thrown for the nine bidders) with his face just centimeters from mine: "You'll never, ever get a franchise for Ottawa."
I can remember Norm Green, then Owner of the Minnesota North Stars, coming over to my table and asking: "What's wrong." "Nothing," I said. "Well, get that smucky look off your face, kid, and get out there and hustle."
Good advice. Lydia Leeder, in Ottawa, on hearing that comment from Cyril later that night said: "You can't stop now! It's just like the Canada/Russia series of 1972. Canadians never quit. Everyone is running to their radios every half hour for an update We're counting on you." Now that's pressure!
We did just that and in fact the last thing the Board of Governors saw before they shut the door to consider the matter the next day at 8:00 am was my nose and the faces of my whole team.
We never stopped.
At about noon that day, the pressure was enormous and frankly getting to me; so I went for a run along the beach (this was Palm Beach in December- actually December 6, 1990). I returned at about ten to one and saw some of my team members waving frantically to me. "What's up," I asked. "The NHL has asked all bidders to be in their suites at one for an announcement," said Connie Cochran. "What announcement?" "They didn't say."
Without a shower, I changed into a suit. At one, NHL security took us down to the basement of the Breakers Hotel, a huge antique of a hotel. Next to rotting garbage and standing under dripping pipes, I turned to my colleagues to say: "Fellows. This doesn't look too good. You have done everything that you could do. I am proud of you. If we have lost, we are going to thank the NHL for allowing us to join this process, we are going to congratulate the winners and then we're going to have a press conference to announce- 'We'll be back'."
Then NHL security took us up to the meeting room. Marcel Aubut (of the Quebec Nordiques) gave Randy Sexton, a big hug: "Felicitation, mon ami," he said. We thought he was congratulating us on a good try!
When I went up to the front of the room and sat next to John Ziegler, I saw the words: 'The NHL is proud to welcome, as conditional Members under the Plan of Sixth expansion, the cities of Ottawa and Tampa." It was a magic moment.
Winners never quit and quitters never win.
(Footnote: about six weeks later, I did call the Governor who had told us that we would never get a franchise. He told me that his comment was part of a plan by a few Governors. They told each bidder the same thing; it was a character test designed to see how each bidder would react. Two of the bidders stormed out; they weren't successful.)
The Ottawa Senators formally returned to the National Hockey League on October 8, 1992 after a 58 year absence; it was another great day for Ottawa. I was at ice level at the old Ottawa Civic Centre when the team was introduced. The people in that arena applauded those playersthey gave them a standing ovationfor six minutes. I realized that they werent really applauding the players, they were applauding themselves. This City came of age that daythere was a feeling that we did it, we did it together. It was that special feeling that only comes from being part of something greater than ourselves. Professional sports can do that. But surely, we can add more days like that. It is a challenge for you to take up. Carpe diem.
Thank
you. Dr. Bruce M. Firestone, B.Eng.(Civil), M.Eng.-Sci., PhD., Adjunct Research
Professor, School of Architecture, Sessional Lecturer, Eric Sprott School of
Business, Carleton University, Chair, Hickling Capital Corporation, Founder,
Ottawa Senators, Ottawa, Canada, December 2001. www.dramatispersonae.org Copyright,
Bruce M. Firestone, December 2001. www.saragassocity.com
| Recessions are Times of Great Opportunity |